power-731824_1280

RWE absorbs innogy activities in final move of E.On asset swap

RWE has today (2 July) taken over the activities of innogy, marking the conclusion of its asset swap with E.On.

The German energy company sold its remaining stake in innogy to E.On as part of the deal, but has today integrated innogy’s renewables and gas storage businesses into its own operations, with over 2,700 employees switching over.

“The new RWE has been completed,” RWE’s CFO, Markus Krebber, said. “It is a new, bigger and more diverse company, with a clear goal.

“We have a wonderful starting point: a huge worldwide renewables portfolio, two teams that complement each other perfectly with many years of experience, and a strong investment programme,” he continued.

Innogy’s stake in the Austrian power utility Kelag has also been transferred today, which RWE said supplements the portfolio “perfectly” with its hydroelectric power business.

The swap – which was been in the works since 2018 and was approved in September 2019 by the European Commission- also saw RWE acquire E.On’s renewable energy activities in 2019.

RWE is aiming to be carbon neutral by 2040, and now is largely focused on power generation over its networks business, which has been transferred to E.On.

Meanwhile, E.On saw a sharp increase in its sales and earnings in Q1 2020 which it said was due to its takeover of innogy and npower, a marked improvement in light of the latter causing its net income to fall by 49% in its financial results for 2019.

power-poles-252203_1280

Centrica launches new Energy as a Service bundle to help businesses build back better

Centrica Business Solutions (CBS) has launched a new Energy as a Service bundle, specifically for those that are looking to make an investment in energy saving technologies.

The capital-free energy generation product is designed to help businesses ‘build back better’ in response to COVID-19.

It will offer a bundle to companies that includes the design, installation and financing of on-site power generation, helping them to decarbonise and reduce their energy bills without the upfront capital expenditure of equipment.

Typically, this would see CBS installing on-site generation technology such as Combined Heat and Power units for a customer, which it will then manage as well as providing any top up electricity or gas needed. The business repays the cost of the technology through the energy savings across the length of the contract.

Additional savings will be made through the use of the generation technologies in wholesale and demand response markets, said CBS.

According to the company, by choosing the bundle, savings can be made in the short term that can then be used to support more long term carbon cutting measures, such as the installation of PV panels or enabling electric vehicles.

“For many organisations, the last few months have been extremely challenging and so reducing costs and improving business resilience will be critical to recovery,” said Alan Barlow, director of UK & Ireland for CBS.

“By helping with the upfront investment in energy solutions, we can support them towards improved energy security and cost savings. Our aim is to support customers who wish to Build Back Better, by transitioning to a sustainable future without the need for significant capital.”

electricity-1854093_1920

EDF preparing cost-cutting plan worth up to three billion euros: sources

PARIS (Reuters) – French state-controlled utility EDF (EDF.PA) has started preparing a cost-cutting plan worth between 2 and 3 billion euros ($1.13 billion), two sources told Reuters, confirming a report by French newspaper Le Monde.

The savings plan could entail divestments of major assets or a hiring and investment freeze, while seeking cost cuts at all levels, Le Monde said on Monday.

An EDF spokesman told Reuters there was a savings plan in the works, but said it was too early to provide details.

EDF, which operates all of France’s 57 nuclear reactors that account for around 70% of the country’s electricity needs, earlier withdrew its financial targets for 2020 and 2021 as the fallout from the coronavirus outbreak hit key areas of its businesses.

wind-turbine-2218457_1280

Vattenfall gets green light for 1.8GW Norfolk Vanguard offshore wind farm

BEIS gives nod to huge 1.8GW wind farm proposed by Swedish energy company, as it delays approval for Ørsted’s Hornsea Three project for the fourth time

Vattenfall has been given the all clear to build the mammoth 1.8GW Norfolk Vanguard offshore windfarm off the east coast of England.

Planning consent was granted earlier this week by Business Secretary Alok Sharma, following a decision in June to postpone the decision by a month.

The Swedish energy giant intends to install between 90 and 180 turbines across an area of just under 600 square kilometres located 47 kilometres from the Norfolk coast. The project is expected to generate enough power for roughly 1.95 million homes.

Gunnar Groebler, senior vice-president for Vattenfall’s wind business, said the firm was delighted to clinch planning consent for the development, which is scheduled to come online in the mid-2020s.

“This decision justifies the confidence that we have in the offshore wind sector in Britain, and we’re looking forward to developing the project and benefiting the local community,” he said.

“Decarbonising our economies starts with one of the most essential resources – electricity,” he added. “Today’s news sends a strong signal that the UK is serious about its climate ambitions and is open for business to power a green economic recovery.” 

Vattenfall had previously questioned the government’s plans for the offshore wind sector after suffering a second round of delays to the Norfolk Vanguard project last month.

Norfolk Vanguard’s sister project, the proposed 1.8GW Norfolk Boreas farm, has also been stung by significant delays to the government consenting procedure. In May, the Department for Business, Energy, and Idustrial Strategy (BEIS) extended the examination period by five months to October, citing the cancellation of hearings due to the coronavirus.

Danielle Lane, country manager and head of offshore wind for Vattenfall in the UK, urged the government to speed up its approvals process. “It’s now vital that other shovel-ready renewable and low-carbon projects are also given the go-ahead as soon as possible,” she said. “Delays of even just a month or so can set back big infrastructure developments by years in some cases. The UK has to go much further, much faster, if it’s going to reach its net zero targets.”

Lane stressed that the offshore wind projects promised to deliver a significant boost to the local economy. “Today is also great news for people living locally, who we’ve been working with over the last four years to develop this project,” she said. “They can look forward to a multi-billion pound economic boost, bringing with it hundreds of new long-term jobs, driving forward a green revolution and helping to level up UK opportunities.”

The developer expects Norfolk Vanguard to generate more than 400 jobs in the onshore construction phase and a further 150 jobs once operational, once combined with Norfolk Boreas’ workforce.

Hugh McNeal, chief executive at trade body RenewableUK, commended government’s decision to approve Norfolk Vanguard and urged it to reach a similar conclusion for Ørsted’s 2.4GW Hornsea Three project, which was subjected to further planning delays this week.

“Investments in major clean energy projects like these are great examples of how we can get the economy moving again, and the Secretary of State’s announcement will boost our ability to meet the government’s 2030 target of 40GW of offshore wind,” McNeal said. “The landmark decision on Norfolk Vanguard means the UK is taking a significant step closer towards our net zero emissions target, and confirmation of a positive decision on Hornsea Three will get us there even faster.”

In a blow for the Danish energy developer, BEIS extended the deadline for its decision on the 300-turbine Hornsea Three project to 31 December 2020 for the fourth time on Tuesday.

Sharma confirmed, however, that he was “minded to approve” the project, subject to further information being submitted by the Danish energy company by the end of September. The new decision date, BEIS said, would allow time for further consultations with interested parties after the new information was provided.

monolithic-part-of-the-waters-3137978_1280

BP and Shell Write-Off Billions in Assets, Citing Covid-19 and Climate Change

The moves were seen as a possible turning point as plummeting demand makes big oil companies admit they’re not worth what they used to be.

Two of the world’s largest energy companies have sent their strongest signals yet that the coronavirus pandemic may accelerate a global transition away from oil, and that billions of dollars invested in fossil fuel assets could go to waste.

This week, Royal Dutch Shell said it would slash the value of its oil and gas assets by up to $22  billion amid a crash in oil prices. The announcement came two weeks after a similar declaration by BP, saying it would reduce the value of its assets by up to $17.5 billion. Both companies said the accounting moves were a response not only to the coronavirus-driven recession, but also to global efforts to tackle climate change.

Some analysts say the global oil and gas industry is undergoing a fundamental transformation and is finally being forced to reckon with a future of dwindling demand for its products.

“I think we may look back on this as the turning point, the moment the industry finally started to say that real assets with real dollar figures associated with them are likely to be ‘stranded'”—or left undeveloped—”in a decarbonizing world,” said Andrew Logan, senior director of oil and gas at Ceres, a sustainable business advocacy group that has represented major investors in their engagement with oil companies. “This is a huge turnaround from the industry’s previous stance, which had been that no existing assets were likely to be stranded, that there may be risks in the future, but not in the here and now. That acknowledgment, that the risk is real and it’s here in the present, is a really big deal.”

wind-turbine-2218457_1280

Good Energy sees ‘first signs’ of pick-up in demand; underlying profit meets expectations

Renewable electricity supplier Good Energy reported that underlying profitability in the year to date had been in line with management’s expectations and said it had started to see the ‘first signs’ of pick-up in demand. A range of ‘planned efficiencies and management initiatives,’ offset the short-term gross margin impact resulting from wholesale energy price reductions, leading to an underlying profit performance in line with the board’s expectations, the company said. Good Energy also said it was starting to see the first signs of increased demand pick up in some half hourly business segments, following weakness in prior months. ‘Overall demand within the energy supply segment remained lower in June, in line with April and May, with an increase in domestic supply largely offset by a decrease in SME volumes, with half hourly business volumes also remaining below normal,’ it added.

coronavirus-4914026_1920

Almost 40% of households report increase in utility bills since Covid-19 began

Almost 60% of Britons say the overall cost of life has increased during the pandemic, according to a new survey

Almost 39% of people globally say their utility bills, including water, electricity, heating, air conditioning, phone, internet and TV services, have increased since the Covid-19 pandemic began.

This is just one of the findings of the latest global Ipsos survey, which shows a majority of people in 26 countries say the costs of food, goods and services have increased since the coronavirus outbreak started.

Almost 60% of the respondents in the UK believe the overall cost of living has increased during the pandemic.

By region, 75% of people in Latin America were most likely to say costs have risen, followed by 72% of those in the Middle East and Africa – more than a third also said transportation and fuel costs had decreased, as a possible consequence of less travel and lockdown restrictions.

Around 56% of people in Turkey said costs have risen, followed by 52% of Malaysians, 51% of Britons and 50% of Canadians.

power-plant-4294655_1280

‘A false start’: Green groups express disappointment in Boris Johnson’s ‘New Deal’ recovery package

Key members of the UK’s green economy have been offering their thoughts on Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Covid-19 recovery package, the fundamentals of which have now been unveiled. The general feeling is one of dismay, following months of campaigning.

In a speech delivered in the West Midlands this morning, Johnson unveiled an initial £5bn for infrastructure and skills projects across the UK. He vowed to “build, build, build” and bring about a “New Deal” for the nation, in which the rebound from the economic crisis borne of the Covid-19 pandemic addresses key social issues.

But the New Deal is far from “Green”, key NGOs, think-tanks, trade bodies and thought leaders are warning.

Johnson has received a string of policy briefings and open letters in recent weeks, urging him to align the recovery package with the UK’s net-zero target and to prioritise funding for sectors spurring the low-carbon transition or working to protect nature. He and Chancellor Rishi Sunak have repeatedly assured the authors of such documents, as well as MPs, journalists and the general public, that policies to boost the manufacture of low-carbon goods and to decarbonise the nation’s most-emitting sectors would form a “vital” part of the Government’s recovery strategy.

Now, key figures are accusing Johnson and Sunak of overstating their “green” commitments and calling for better environmental provisions to be unveiled by the Treasury next month.

Here, edie rounds up the key concerns which the package has raised across the UK’s green economy.

Poor provisions for retrofitting

Buildings account for around 40% of global emissions and one-third of energy use in the UK and, while improved standards for new housing and business properties are forthcoming, the UK Government has repeatedly been accused of failing to support the decarbonisation of existing stock.

The Department for Education has this week outlined a £1bn package to retrofit schools, but Students Organising for Sustainability claims that £23bn would be necessary to ensure that all schools are net-zero by 2030.

More broadly, the Conservative Party had pledged £9.2bn for retrofitting in its 2019 general election manifesto – a figure which groups including the Sustainable Energy Association and Association for Distributed Energy (ADE) were keen to see come to fruition in the recovery package.

“Investing in a national buildings renovation programme will support local jobs and SMEs right now and will be an important part of the UK’s green economic recovery,” the ADE’s head of external affairs Lucy Symons-Jones said. “The £9.2bn promised in the Conservative Party manifesto will support the engineers and installers who are ready to deliver an immediate national building retrofit programme. Without this funding, these local skilled workers face redundancy.”

The EEIG has also expressed disappointment in the lack of energy efficiency provisions in Johnson’s speech. The body’s previous research claimed that 40,000 jobs could be created in the UK within 24 months, through an ambitious retrofitting programme, with a further 110,000 roles created through to 2030.

“Energy efficiency [is] perhaps the most urgent of all infrastructure priorities,” UKGBC chief executive Julie Hirogoyen added. “[It[ can create jobs right around the country, improve health and reduce costs to NHS, and increase consumer spending power by lowering energy bills.” 

A lack of movement on heat and flexible energy

11 months ago, Citizens Advice warned that the Government’s failure to implement a “credible” framework for the decarbonisation of heat for commercial and domestic use could undermine public confidence in the net-zero transition.

BEIS has since faced repeated calls to accelerate the development of a national heat strategy, particularly since Covid-19 was declared a pandemic.

While the Department announced a £25m pot for heat pumps this week, such a strategy still seems not to be forthcoming. Moreover, Johnson’s speech made no specific reference to heat.

Businesses including Flexitricity, SE2 and Lux Nova have warned that the UK is missing an opportunity here, not only to decarbonise, but to improve wellbeing and to reduce NHS costs.

Poor clarity on skills

Up to 2.2 million Brits could face unemployment unless the UK’s Covid-19 recovery package contains measures to reskill them for “green-collar” roles, Mayors and council leaders representing 25 million residents warned yesterday (29 June).

Calls for increased skills measures have also been made by the likes of National Grid, Oxford University academics and The Energy Transitions Commission – a body representing 40 global organisations including major employers like Heathrow Airport, BP and HSBC.

The UK Government was reportedly set to launch a dedicated fund for reskilling Brits to work in the renewable energy, cleantech and built environment sectors, coupled with additional investment in these sectors to assist with their expansion. The Conservative Party is notably targeting two million “green-collar” jobs in the UK by 2030.

While Johnson did make passing reference to skills in his speech, any green strings were notably absent.

“Jobs, skills and infrastructure are core to the UK’s green recovery,” the Energy Networks Association’s chief executive David Smith said. “Building ahead of need so that electric vehicles can be rolled out at pace, gas can be greened and industry can be decarbonised, creating the green collar jobs that will keep the UK at the front of the fight against climate change.”

“The Prime Minister’s speech rightly identifies the importance of ‘building back greener’ but this has to be rapidly backed up by support for shovel-ready projects and policy decisions that are aligned with the UK’s climate, environmental and clean growth goals,” Aldersgate Group director Nick Molho added. “Such an approach is not just needed to meet the UK’s environmental ambitions, but it is also essential to ensure that the UK’s recovery plan can address key public interest concerns around unemployment, regional inequality and resilience.”

Continued investment in high-carbon sectors

“A real Green New Deal wouldn’t just mean more spending on infrastructure,” campaign group Green New Deal UK tweeted during Johnson’s speech in Dudley. “It would mean a rewiring of the British economy to be climate-resilient, it would mean a pay rise for key workers – and it would mean spending enough money to meet the challenges in front of us.”

The tweet is alluding to the fact that the package contains a £100m pot for road building programmes, in addition to the £27bn promised in the 2020 Budget. Moreover, “green strings” relating to the package’s funding, either in full or in part, are yet to be confirmed.

In contrast, the  European Union has ringfenced 25% of its €750bn fund to help the bloc recover from the coronavirus crisis to mitigating the climate crisis.

“Johnson’s plan to ‘build, build, build’ includes a massive road-building programme and a deeply alarming deregulation of the housing market,” Scottish Green Party co-leader Patrick Harvie said.  “Both of these could cause enormous environmental damage, as well as increasing emissions.”

“Boris Johnson’s speech should have fired the starting gun on a healthier, more resilient future for the UK,” Green Alliance’s executive director Shaun Spiers said.

“Unfortunately, the PM seems to have got off to false start. This statement today is about putting shovels in the ground, but there is no point in that in the long term if it digs the UK deeper into trouble…Let’s hope the Chancellor is listening and ups the government’s game next week – putting people, climate and nature front and centre of the government’s recovery strategy.”

“To avoid catastrophe, we need a low-carbon nature-powered recovery, not one weighed down by tarmac and concrete,” WWF UK’s chief executive Tanya Steele added. “This is another missed opportunity – and we don’t have many chances left.”

Nature hanging in the balance 

On the “nature-powered” aspect, it is worth noting that a recommitment to reforest parts of the country by planting more than 75,000 acres of trees every year by 2025 has been made. A £40m fund to boost local conservation projects has also been announced, and is expected to create around 3,000 jobs while safeguarding 2,000 existing jobs.

Nonetheless, Johnson also said he would be willing to remove wildlife that presents an obstacle to building work on key infrastructure projects. 

“An economic recovery which puts investment in nature first would reap big dividends in tackling climate crisis – helping to absorb up to a third of UK emissions – as well as tackling health inequalities, and providing more jobs, skills and opportunities to support the next generation,” the Wildlife Trusts’ chief executive Craig Bennett said. 

boris-johnson-4606640_1920

Swansea tidal lagoon backers call for Boris Johnson to greenlight project

The chief executive of the Swansea Tidal Lagoon has called for Boris Johnson to give the go ahead to the renewable energy project, saying that the UK will need to use “every green project we can” if it is to decarbonise its energy system.

Currently, the project is waiting for the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy to approve a decommissioning plan which would allow work to begin on site.

However, if the plan is not signed off in the next eight days, the planning consent for the £1.3bn project will be lost. 

Speaking to City A.M., Mark Shorrock said that the development needed someone in Whitehall to push it over the line.

“We need the Prime Minister to say to Whitehall, ‘I want to do this project – take that decommissioning plan out of the drawer”.

Johnson has previously spoken out in support of the Swansea lagoon, which would power 155,000 homes at least, when he was running to be the leader of the Conservative party.

 “He’s said he wants to see Swansea get going. He has said Britain’s recovery is all about jobs, apprenticeships and long term investment and we have this wonderful project that’s on the cusp of being able to break ground at the end of the week with our global alliance partners”, Shorrock told the BBC.

“We can turn the tide on economic downturn with tidal. We hope the Prime Minister can get behind us.”

Over the weekend the Daily Mail reported that a group of 25 backbench Tory MPs were lobbying business secretary Alok Sharma to push the plan through.

Former party leader Iain Duncan Smith, who is one of the group’s leaders, said that the lagoon was the type of “shovel ready” project the government should be embracing to create jobs after the coronavirus pandemic.

Shorrock told City A.M. that the project presented the government with a chance to develop a world-leading industry in the UK with developments all around the country, thus pushing its levelling-up agenda.

Back in 2017, a review of the project by former energy minister Charles Hendry concluded that moving ahead with the pilot project was a “no regrets policy”.

The Swansea project will support 2,200 jobs, but expansion to a second project at Cardiff would mean a further 11,000 jobs. 

Looking further ahead, a fleet of four Welsh tidal lagoons would lead to 33,500 positions being created and six tidal lagoons across the UK would mean employment for 71,000.

The initial project will require a subsidy of £18m from the government, but the subsequent lagoons would pay for themselves, Shorrock said.

“The national significance is enormous if we get Swansea away. Then we can do it at Cardiff and Colwyn Bay, but not with any subsidy. That’s already £13.7 billion into the UK economy”, he added.

Furthermore, the cost of the energy the lagoons would provide has now been lowered to the point where it is now cheaper than nuclear.

In addition, he said, working with supply chains across the UK would mean that 84p out of every £1 spent on the billion-pound project would be spent in this country.

Shorrock said that he already had a team working on two tidal lagoon projects in France, demonstrating the export value of the proposition.

If it is given the go-ahead, the lagoon will be built by a consortium of some of the UK’s biggest construction companies, including Costain, Atkins, GE and Keltbray.

According to Shorrock, BEIS officials had already approved the decommissioning plan back in March, but the firm is still awaiting proper sign-off. 

A government spokesman said: “Any proposed project like the Swansea Bay Tidal Lagoon must provide value for money for the consumer, which we have been clear about since this project was first proposed. Following extensive analysis, the project did not meet this criteria.”

D5ZIvUZXkAAdvJj

Ofgem caps UK power balancing costs

UK energy regulator Ofgem has decided to cap balancing service payments to help market participants manage increased balancing costs owing to the Covid-19 pandemic.

The Balancing Services Use of System (BSUoS) price will be capped at £15/MWh (€6.56/MWh) in each settlement period until 31 August, and any under-recovery of revenue will be recovered through BSUoS charges equally across all settlement periods in 2021-22. This will take effect from 25 June.

Balancing costs are rising as the National Grid Electricity System Operator (ESO) takes a number of measures to help it deal with reduced demand, including paying a unit at the Sizewell B nuclear station not to run.

The ESO in May forecast total BSUoS costs for May-August at around £826mn, under an assumed fall in demand of 15-20pc. This was an increase of £441mn compared with a forecast made in February.

But UK power demand has since recovered to around 5-10pc below normal levels, Ofgem said.

The ESO this month reduced its forecast BSUoS costs for May-August to £593mn-£656mn, assuming demand remains 5-10pc lower than usual.

Ofgem expects deferred payments will be less than 5pc of total BSUoS charges from 25 June-31 August.

If the amount of deferred costs exceeds £100mn, Ofgem will examine how to mitigate the ESO’s exposure to the loss on revenue.

The deferred charges would have totalled £8.5mn last month, had the cap been in place, from 112 settlement periods, the regulator said.

By Killian Staines